Age |
Premium |
Value |
Death |
Premium |
Investment |
Value |
Death |
33 |
4800 |
0 |
403081 |
552 |
4248 |
4432.309 |
504432.3 |
34 |
4800 |
0 |
406376 |
552 |
4248 |
9211.224 |
509211.2 |
35 |
12000 |
10250 |
416972 |
552 |
11448 |
21876.24 |
521876.2 |
36 |
12000 |
22016 |
428221 |
552 |
11448 |
35531.66 |
535531.7 |
37 |
12000 |
34850 |
440538 |
552 |
11448 |
50254.93 |
550254.9 |
38 |
12000 |
48445 |
453615 |
552 |
11448 |
66129.56 |
566129.6 |
39 |
12000 |
63227 |
467881 |
552 |
11448 |
83245.59 |
583245.6 |
40 |
12000 |
78955 |
483092 |
552 |
11448 |
101700.1 |
601700.1 |
41 |
12000 |
95934 |
499553 |
552 |
11448 |
121597.7 |
621597.7 |
42 |
12000 |
114949 |
518051 |
552 |
11448 |
143051.4 |
643051.4 |
43 |
11223 |
135690 |
538275 |
552 |
10671 |
165372 |
665372 |
44 |
10620 |
157664 |
559732 |
552 |
10068 |
188808.9 |
688808.9 |
45 |
10620 |
181318 |
582869 |
552 |
10068 |
214078.6 |
714078.6 |
46 |
10620 |
206950 |
607984 |
552 |
10068 |
241324.3 |
741324.3 |
47 |
10620 |
234770 |
635287 |
552 |
10068 |
270700.7 |
770700.7 |
48 |
10620 |
264864 |
664864 |
552 |
10068 |
302374.3 |
802374.3 |
49 |
10620 |
296943 |
696943 |
552 |
10068 |
336524.8 |
836524.8 |
50 |
10620 |
331612 |
731612 |
552 |
10068 |
373345.9 |
873345.9 |
51 |
10620 |
369133 |
769133 |
552 |
10068 |
413046.3 |
913046.3 |
52 |
10620 |
409863 |
809863 |
552 |
10068 |
455851.4 |
955851.4 |
53 |
10620 |
453985 |
853985 |
1575 |
9045 |
500936.4 |
1000936 |
54 |
10620 |
501782 |
901782 |
1575 |
9045 |
549547.1 |
1049547 |
55 |
10620 |
553473 |
953473 |
1575 |
9045 |
601959.1 |
1101959 |
56 |
10620 |
609358 |
1009358 |
1575 |
9045 |
658469.7 |
1158470 |
57 |
10620 |
669919 |
1069919 |
1575 |
9045 |
719399.5 |
1219399 |
58 |
10620 |
735505 |
1135505 |
1575 |
9045 |
785094 |
1285094 |
59 |
10620 |
806558 |
1206558 |
1575 |
9045 |
855925.8 |
1355926 |
60 |
10620 |
883446 |
1283446 |
1575 |
9045 |
932296.6 |
1432297 |
61 |
10620 |
966576 |
1366576 |
1575 |
9045 |
1014640 |
1514640 |
62 |
10620 |
1056580 |
1456580 |
1575 |
9045 |
1103422 |
1603422 |
63 |
0 |
1143823 |
1456580 |
0 |
0 |
1189709 |
1189709 |
64 |
0 |
1238855 |
1511403 |
0 |
0 |
1282745 |
1282745 |
65 |
0 |
1341551 |
1609861 |
0 |
0 |
1383055 |
1383055 |
66 |
0 |
1304978 |
1581027 |
0 |
0 |
1337013 |
1337013 |
67 |
0 |
1267837 |
1550996 |
0 |
0 |
1287369 |
1287369 |
68 |
0 |
1230983 |
1520603 |
0 |
0 |
1233844 |
1233844 |
69 |
0 |
1194144 |
1489327 |
0 |
0 |
1176133 |
1176133 |
70 |
0 |
1157463 |
1457112 |
0 |
0 |
1113909 |
1113909 |
71 |
0 |
1121188 |
1402368 |
0 |
0 |
1046819 |
1046819 |
72 |
0 |
1085612 |
1343205 |
0 |
0 |
974482.2 |
974482.2 |
These tables are based on a whole life insurance policy illustration given to me on June 24th, 2012. The first Premium, Value and Death columns represent the Premium, Cash Value and Death Benefit of the $400,000 Whole Life Insurance policy with an increasing death benefit. The second Premium, Investment, Value and Death columns represent the effect of purchasing a 20 Year $500,000 Term Life Insurance policy with Primerica and investing the difference into an investment account.
- Assumes a 7.82% Interest Rate
- Whole Life Premium = Term Life Premium + Investment
- At age 66, annual withdrawls of $143,014 are made
- LV(M) = LV(M-1) * 1.0782 + sum (n=1,12) [ (LI(M)/12)*(1+.0782/12)^n ]
LV(M) stands for LifeValue and represents the value in the investment account after the Mth year for the "Buy Term and Invest the Difference" strategy. LI(M) stands for LifeInvestment and represents the value being invested during the Mth year. The term "sum(n=1,12)" is usually written using a capital sigma and is a shorthand notation which represents adding all the terms as n ranges from 1 to 12.
Renewable Term versus Convertible Term
Here, I assume that at age 53, I will use the guaranteed renewal aspect to purchase a new 20 year term. Then, at age 63, I will let the policy lapse. The reason I did this is to try to compare with the policy illustration which assumed no more payments would be made at age 63.
It is important to note that Primerica Life Insurance is renewable term (no need for new medical exams). Most term life insurance is convertible term, which is not good, since you only have the option to convert to whole life after the term is finished. These companies plan to hit you with high renewal rates in the future.
Theory of Decreasing Responsibility
Based on the theory of decreasing responsibility, once the kids are grown and the mortgages are paid off, the need for life insurance goes down dramatically. In general, this means that you would normally stop paying for life insurance as you get older since the rates will start to become extremely high.
Whole Life Cash Value
In a whole life policy (aka universal life, indexed universal life, variable life), the cash value is owned by the life insurance company. There are often more fees and less control than in a normal retirement account. Since premiums are paid with after tax dollars, this is comparable to using a ROTH IRA to accumulate money tax free. One might also compare the wealth transfer ability of various ROTH IRAs to the wealth transfer ability of a whole life policy, in terms of being able to avoid income tax, estate tax and probate.
Unlike using a ROTH IRA, when the "withdrawls" occur, there is a major difference between the whole life policy and the ROTH IRA. In a whole life policy, the withdrawls are loaned from the account. This means that after the withdrawls from age 66 to 72, the cash value loan would be $1,001,098, meaning that you might have to pay $40,000 or so a year to cover interest. This is used to pay for the continued life insurance coverage each year! Most people don't know this and their policy typically implodes on itself as they get older and coverage becomes more expensive. This is why I have not run the numbers out to age 121. My illustration was run out to age 121 to imply that I would have a 9.6 million cash value and 11.2 million death benefit.
Even worse is that the assumed rate of 7.82% may not even be achieved in which case keeping the whole life policy is even more difficult. The increased cost given here along with the analysis is why over 25% of people lapse their whole life policy within the first three years, after paying a lot of money in commissions and fees.
Conclusion
The conclusion is that you might wait 30 or 40 years for your whole life policy to catch up to the alternative. After that time, you will then realize that your policy can no longer handle the high cost of insurance coverage. My advice would be to do some research or ask a professional since many times these contracts may be quite complex.
Dedicated to Jerry Izu.
Support My Mission
1. You can support my mission by donating via my e-mail address (scottizu@gmail.com) and PayPal.
2. You can support the mission of SAGE by donating at http://sagescholars.berkeley.edu/. The UC Berkeley SAGE (Student Achievement Guided by Experience) is a self-funded experiential leadership program that provides education, professional development, mentoring and internships to UC Berkeley students who come from poverty and low income backgrounds.
3. You may also contact me for a free 1-hour consultation to discuss how I can help you.
No comments:
Post a Comment